Re: Prestige users

From: Paul Thomas <paul(at)tmsl(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Bruce <bruce(at)centerstage(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Prestige users
Date: 2004-05-05 15:13:44
Message-ID: 20040505161344.A4640@bacon
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy


On 05/05/2004 00:39 Bruce wrote:
> We've got a raging debate going on now on whether we should move from a
> Foxpro back end to either PostgreSQL or MySQL.
>
> It's an accounting application and I feel that Postgres would be the
> better choice. Some other people (like my boss) thinks that MySQL would
> be better choice. His reasoning is that MySQL gets more publicity so it
> must be better. He says that since the Sabre airline reservation system
> and Yahoo run with MySQL, they are the best. Period.
>
> I'm sure Postgres has a couple prestige organizations that use database.
> If I could come up with some big names, I'm pretty sure we could make
> everyone into believers. Unfortunately, the only thing close to a "name"
> on the website is the company BSAF.

Show him

http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html

and ask him how much he values the company's accounting data.
--
Paul Thomas
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+
| Thomas Micro Systems Limited | Software Solutions for
Business |
| Computer Consultants |
http://www.thomas-micro-systems-ltd.co.uk |
+------------------------------+---------------------------------------------+

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2004-05-05 15:15:55 Re: Prestige users
Previous Message Jeff Self 2004-05-05 14:15:09 Re: Distributions which contain postgresql