From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)svr1(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE TODO items |
Date: | 2004-05-05 15:38:34 |
Message-ID: | 200405051538.i45FcYU01529@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote:
> > I don't think so. As I remember it was part of doing logical attribute
> > numbers as a way to add ALTER COLUMN TYPE, but because we now use table
> > recreate to implement this, it is unlikely we will ever add logical
> > attribute numbers (adds too much complexity to the code).
>
> Does using table recreate break views built against the table? I recall
> someone saying the old way did, it would be very nice if that could be
> fixed or at least added to the TODO. I like the idea of being able to
> alter the positions of the columns too, but that's not as big of an
> issue as breaking views.
Yea, I think it will break views. You have to recreate them.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-05 16:09:31 | pgsql-server/src/bin/initdb initdb.c |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2004-05-05 15:30:36 | Re: ALTER TABLE TODO items |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2004-05-05 15:57:07 | Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2004-05-05 15:30:36 | Re: ALTER TABLE TODO items |