From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl> |
Cc: | Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? |
Date: | 2004-05-05 03:21:18 |
Message-ID: | 200405050321.i453LI518279@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Hackers,
>
> I've whacked the subtrans patch enough so that the simple tests (i.e.
> non concurrent) for tuple visibility work. I can create a table and
> populate it in subtransactions, rollback or commit them selectively and
> get the desired effect at the end. Naturally, catalog entries also
> behave [somewhat] sanely. Oh, I made pg_subtrans work too. (Though
> whether it's relatively bug-free is yet to be proven.)
>
> I'm now looking at changing the concurrent visibility rules, i.e.
> utils/time/tqual.c. It seems to me one of the most important parts is
> making TransactionIdIsInProgress() behave, that is, yield true for every
> committed and in-progress subtransaction of a current transaction tree.
> (Not only the topmost Xid, which is what it currently does.)
>
> So, the big question is, how do we do this? The most obvious way (to
> me) is to keep the whole array inside the PGPROC struct. This would be
> nice because it would only need little modification to
> access/transam/varsup.c. The main downside is that it potentially
> requires a lot of shared memory. Can we afford that?
>
> I am already keeping the list of committed Xids in a backend-local list,
> but of course this is not visible to other backends.
I remember going through this. Other backends will use pg_subtrans to
know what transactions are in progress. They have to do the standard
lookups to find the status of the parent transaction. The backend-local
list of xids is needed so the commit can clean up those subtransaction
xids so that later transactions don't have to use pg_subtrans.
Does this help?
Sorry I haven't gotten your patches in yet. Tom is working on some
other back patches. Also, do you have a plan to handle some of the more
complex issues like locking in subtransactions?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2004-05-05 04:00:12 | Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-05 03:21:07 | Re: Multiple Xids in PGPROC? |