From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fixed directory locations in installs |
Date: | 2004-05-03 19:47:25 |
Message-ID: | 200405032147.25056.peter_e@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches |
Tom Lane wrote:
> > What use could printing the relative path possibly have?
>
> Debugging. If I can't see it, I *know* I'm going to wish I could.
Well, you can just look inside, it's not that big. Supporting extra
options might make the script twice as big and thus make it harder to
just look at the whole thing.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-05-03 19:51:00 | Re: Weird prepared stmt behavior |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-03 19:34:41 | Re: Fixed directory locations in installs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-05-03 20:11:44 | Re: mingw configure failure workaround |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-03 19:34:41 | Re: Fixed directory locations in installs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-05-03 20:11:44 | Re: mingw configure failure workaround |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-05-03 19:34:41 | Re: Fixed directory locations in installs |