Re: Fixed directory locations in installs

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fixed directory locations in installs
Date: 2004-05-03 17:43:47
Message-ID: 200405031943.47227.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> We'd also need to give some thought to pg_config output. I think I
> would like to be able to see the relative path computed by configure
> as well as the effective actual path ... maybe a switch to specify
> which way to print it?

What use could printing the relative path possibly have? It would only
be relative to the location of pg_config, which is of no interest to
the user of the printed information. Let's not make this more
complicated than it needs to be.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Robinson 2004-05-03 17:57:18 Re: Weird prepared stmt behavior
Previous Message sdv mailer 2004-05-03 17:35:10 Re: PostgreSQL pre-fork speedup

Browse pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-05-03 18:02:47 Re: mingw configure failure workaround
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2004-05-03 17:42:16 man pages on win32

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-05-03 18:02:47 Re: mingw configure failure workaround
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-05-03 16:22:55 Re: Fixed directory locations in installs