From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ANALYZE locks pg_listener in EXCLUSIVE for long time? |
Date: | 2004-05-03 03:13:04 |
Message-ID: | 200405030313.i433D4M13962@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > Does this mean that ANALYZE will take an exclusive lock on pg_listener
> > until the ANALYZE finishes? Or is there some other cause?
>
> ANALYZE does not take an exclusive lock on anything. However, the
> async.c functions want AccessExclusiveLock on pg_listener, so they
> quite possibly would get blocked by ANALYZE's not-so-exclusive lock.
>
> Possibly we could reduce the strength of the lock taken by the async.c
> functions ... I haven't thought hard about it. The long-term answer is
> certainly a wholesale rewrite of the listen/notify mechanism.
Gavin was working on it a while ago but I am not sure how far he got.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ted Kremenek | 2004-05-03 03:22:07 | Re: [CHECKER] 4 memory leaks in Postgresql 7.4.2 |
Previous Message | Claudio Natoli | 2004-05-03 03:00:30 | Re: Fixed directory locations in installs |