Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SET WITHOUT CLUSTER patch
Date: 2004-05-02 22:23:30
Message-ID: 200405022223.i42MNUG09366@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> > Uh, if the CLUSTER doesn't recurse, the WITHOUT shouldn't either, I
> > think, and throwing an error seems fine to me, even if it isn't the same
> > wording as a syntax error.
>
> Well, maybe - up to you.

Well, if we don't recurse on creation, does it make sense to recurse on
destruction? Seems it might surpise people. Do we have that asymetry
in any other area?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-05-02 22:57:50 Re: Fixed directory locations in installs
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-05-02 22:20:57 Re: Fixed directory locations in installs