| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Date: | 2004-04-30 04:58:21 |
| Message-ID: | 20040430015713.H45839@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 30 Apr 2004, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
> And if we always set deadlines independent of the required development
> time, then we may never get a win32 port or any other major feature that
> takes a little more time and attention.
Actually, that one doesn't hold ... it just means that we need to mature
our development environments to match the larger projects that need to
happen ... we are using CVS, there is nothing that stops a side-branch
being started, like we did with the Win32 stuff and then merging it back
up when the feature is ready ..
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | zhuangjifeng | 2004-04-30 04:59:09 | How does postgres remain the unique index unique? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-04-30 04:56:44 | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |