Re: postgresql idle

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgresql idle
Date: 2004-04-29 19:19:18
Message-ID: 20040429191918.GD2058@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 02:04:47PM -0400, Jon Pastore wrote:
> pgsql thought there was a transaction in progress and was waiting
> for it to complete when in fact the commit had already taken place.

Come again? That doesn't sound possible. What ismore likely is that
somebody issues COMMIT;BEGIN; all at once. You get one transaction
through, but you still end up idle in transaciton.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Sullivan 2004-04-29 19:41:32 Re: Timestamp problems...wrong weeks.
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2004-04-29 18:43:12 Re: Arbitrary precision modulo operation