From: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Karl O(dot) Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Plpgsql problem passing ROWTYPE to function |
Date: | 2004-04-30 00:05:06 |
Message-ID: | 20040429190506.A9878@mofo.meme.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2004.04.29 17:58 Tom Lane wrote:
> "Karl O. Pinc" <kop(at)meme(dot)com> writes:
> > Thought perhaps some other eyes than mine can tell if I'm doing
> > something wrong here or if there's a bug somewhere. I've never
> > passed a ROWTYPE varaible to a function
>
> plpgsql doesn't support that. It might do so for 7.5, if anyone gets
> around to finishing the work I started.
What a drag. The documentation says it supports this. Is this a bug
in the documentation
or something I'm not understanding?
See:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/plpgsql-declarations.html#PLPGSQL-DECLARATION-ROWTYPES
"Parameters to a function can be composite types (complete table
rows). In that case, the corresponding identifier $n will be a row
variable, and fields can be selected from it, for example $1.user_id."
Thanks for the help.
Karl <kop(at)meme(dot)com>
Free Software: "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
-- Robert A. Heinlein
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Gass | 2004-04-30 00:10:37 | TCP only listening on localhost??? |
Previous Message | Edmund Dengler | 2004-04-29 23:47:48 | Re: Unable to use index? |