Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date: 2004-04-26 18:01:43
Message-ID: 20040426180143.GA28909@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 10:25:29PM -0400, Christopher Browne wrote:
>
> I'll point out one "fly in ointment" that has been noticed; on AIX,
> there are compilation tools that are difficult to live without, namely
> "mkldexport.sh", that lives pretty deep in the source tree.

That's just a problem to do with autoconf. All we gots to do is find
an autoconf genius. I don't think it entails that we need a complete
built source tree for everything.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2004-04-26 18:05:10 Re: FW: getting a crash during initdb
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-04-26 17:51:28 Re: Bringing PostgreSQL torwards the standard regarding case folding