From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib, etc. |
Date: | 2004-04-26 17:37:40 |
Message-ID: | 20040426173740.GE41429@nasby.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 05:15:19PM -0400, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
> (5) Programming languages. We need to make a programming language standard
> in PostgreSQL. plpgsql is good, but isn't someone working on a Java
> language. That would be pretty slick.
If there's going to be a single standard language, I strongly believe it
should be plpgsql. Any other language means that you have to find
something that someone else knows or is willing to learn, whereas anyone
using a database already knows SQL. plpgsql is simply an extension of
SQL, and is trivial for anyone who's worked with any other database
procedural languages to pickup. Asking a DBA to learn java or perl or
PHP is asking a lot.
If anything I'd like to see more features brought into plpgsql, like
packages (ala Oracle).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-04-26 17:51:28 | Re: Bringing PostgreSQL torwards the standard regarding case folding |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-04-26 17:27:32 | Re: Thread code not vpath-safe |