Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib, etc.

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jim(at)nasby(dot)net>
To: pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib, etc.
Date: 2004-04-26 17:37:40
Message-ID: 20040426173740.GE41429@nasby.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Apr 25, 2004 at 05:15:19PM -0400, pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com wrote:
> (5) Programming languages. We need to make a programming language standard
> in PostgreSQL. plpgsql is good, but isn't someone working on a Java
> language. That would be pretty slick.

If there's going to be a single standard language, I strongly believe it
should be plpgsql. Any other language means that you have to find
something that someone else knows or is willing to learn, whereas anyone
using a database already knows SQL. plpgsql is simply an extension of
SQL, and is trivial for anyone who's worked with any other database
procedural languages to pickup. Asking a DBA to learn java or perl or
PHP is asking a lot.

If anything I'd like to see more features brought into plpgsql, like
packages (ala Oracle).
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant jim(at)nasby(dot)net
Member: Triangle Fraternity, Sports Car Club of America
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-04-26 17:51:28 Re: Bringing PostgreSQL torwards the standard regarding case folding
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2004-04-26 17:27:32 Re: Thread code not vpath-safe