From: | Juris Krumins <juriskr(at)komin(dot)lv> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: cache lookup of relation 165058647 failed |
Date: | 2004-04-26 09:35:31 |
Message-ID: | 20040426123152.C61393@juriskr_workstation |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-general |
I'v find out that this error occurs in:
dependency.c file
2004-04-26 11:09:34 ERROR: dependency.c 1621: cache lookup of relation
149064743 failed
2004-04-26 11:09:34 ERROR: Relation "tmp_table1" does not exist
2004-04-26 11:09:34 ERROR: Relation "tmp_table1" does not exist
in getRelationDescription(StringInfo buffer, Oid relid) function.
Any ideas what can cause this errors.
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
> Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> writes:
> > The error is complaining about a relation that used to have an OID of
> > 165058647. This is almost certainly a temporary table. Are there any plpgsql
> > functions referring to a temporary table, or do you create, drop, recreate
> > tmp_table1 within the same connection?
>
> The trace suggests this is happening immediately after connect, so the
> last part doesn't sound right. It could be a plpgsql function problem,
> though the query doesn't look like it invokes any functions.
>
> What I was wondering about was dangling references within a view, that
> is a view referring to a table that no longer exists. (That shouldn't
> happen anymore in 7.3 and later, but if this is a pre-7.3 system then
> it's possible.) Does this query make use of any views, and if so do the
> views change from time to time?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nishad Prakash | 2004-04-26 19:33:04 | Regression test fails on Solaris 9 for 7.4.2 |
Previous Message | Kris Jurka | 2004-04-26 08:43:22 | Re: BUG #1141: jdbc-ant-script does not support java version |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | John Sidney-Woollett | 2004-04-26 09:52:31 | Re: Restart increment to each year = re-invent the |
Previous Message | Bruno Baguette | 2004-04-26 09:21:19 | Restart increment to 0 each year = re-invent the sequences mecanism ? |