From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
Subject: | Re: Usability, MySQL, Postgresql.org, gborg, contrib, etc. |
Date: | 2004-04-26 17:19:31 |
Message-ID: | 200404261019.31685.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> When all is said and done, I think the PostgreSQL project lacks a "Product
> Management" group which steers the public perception and defines
> usability. This is something *all* other systems have, including MySQL.
Well, NO, not a chance.
As one of the de-facto heads of our Advocacy group, let me say "you've got to
be kidding."
MySQL is a private closed-shop software manufacturer who uses the GPL as one
of their methods of distribution. They are not a "real" open source project
-- they are a private, commercial, for-profit software company.
We are not. We are a open, 100% voluntary community of contributing
developers and support volunteers. Nobody is going to take orders from a
"Product Manager", that's a position for paid software products departments.
It would be horribly inappropriate for PostgreSQL, and would destroy
everything that has made us successful to date. You can't give orders to
volunteers.
You're statement that "all other systems" have a Product Manager is also
wildly inaccurate. I think you're thinking of MySQL and Mozilla only.
Heck, even OpenOffice.org doesn't have a Product Manager, and that is a
Sun-sponsored project. Let alone, say, emacs. Or Linux.
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shachar Shemesh | 2004-04-26 17:20:15 | Re: Do we prefer software that works or software |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-04-26 17:16:07 | Re: Do we prefer software that works or software that looks good? |