Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions

From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions
Date: 2004-04-23 19:34:42
Message-ID: 20040423193442.GA5329@phlogiston.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 01:05:40AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> This is all I'm saying ... its like when we packaged up our first eRServer
> ... I didn't require our clients to go out and download PostgreSQL to
> build it, I pulled in the few files from our build environment into the
> package so that it could be built independently ...

I am the last person in the world to cast aspersions on anyone's
packaging, but I'm not sure holding erserver up as a paradigm case of
easy compilation outside the main build tree is going to make your
argument easier here.

A

--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shachar Shemesh 2004-04-23 19:40:33 Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2004-04-23 19:27:30 Re: [HACKERS] What can we learn from MySQL?