From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca> |
Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)ihs(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |
Date: | 2004-04-23 00:09:24 |
Message-ID: | 20040422210756.A32445@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Rod Taylor wrote:
> I guess that is where we differ in opinion. pgadmin is not addon or an
> enhancement, it is a part of the core project every bit as much as the
> gnome-panel is a part of gnome. Sure, gnome-libs does all the heavy
> lifting, but without the panel most users are lost.
No it isn't ... you don't need pgadmin, or jdbc, or libpgtcl, or ... to
run a PostgreSQL server ... you need the postgresql core, and, as things
are going, libpq and that is about it ... even psql is becoming less of a
requirement as the support utilities that have been using it move towards
C vs shell wrappers ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-23 00:27:33 | Threading for 7.5 |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-04-23 00:06:58 | Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions |