Re: License question

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: License question
Date: 2004-04-22 18:32:44
Message-ID: 200404221832.i3MIWi523320@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 09:19, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
> >
> >
> >>The license given in the web link you mention seems to mandate all
> >>related work to be under the same license, which is nowhere near what
> >>BSD means.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >What license text do you think implies this?
> >
> >-Neil
> >
> >
> >
> >
> provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph and the
> following two paragraphs appear in all copies.
>
> I read that to mean that all copies must have the same license.

It just means you can't remove the original license file.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-22 18:37:28 Re: valgrind errors
Previous Message Barry Lind 2004-04-22 17:55:04 Re: contrib vs. gborg/pgfoundry for replication solutions