Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters?
Date: 2004-04-22 01:37:09
Message-ID: 200404220137.i3M1b9705956@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jim Seymour wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > I don't have any problem using a backup MX. My sendmail rules skip over
> > the received line from my MX and check the host that sent to my MX.
>
> What do you do if you don't like the client that delivered it to your
> backup MX? You can't just throw it away. Well, you *can*, but doing
> so breaks the email delivery system. If reject it, your backup MX will
> then bounce it to the ostensible sender, which is very likely forged.

For stuff I block via sendmail, I 550 it, even from my MX. I am not
sure what my MX does with it, but no one has complained.

For email that hits procmail, I ignore viruses and report spam to the
domain administrator of the mail sender host.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2004-04-22 01:45:43 Re: 7.3.4 on Linux: UPDATE .. foo=foo+1 degrades massivly over time
Previous Message Jon Pastore 2004-04-22 01:12:27 postgresql idle