From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT] Tom's/Marc's spam filters? |
Date: | 2004-04-22 01:37:09 |
Message-ID: | 200404220137.i3M1b9705956@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jim Seymour wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >
> [snip]
> >
> > I don't have any problem using a backup MX. My sendmail rules skip over
> > the received line from my MX and check the host that sent to my MX.
>
> What do you do if you don't like the client that delivered it to your
> backup MX? You can't just throw it away. Well, you *can*, but doing
> so breaks the email delivery system. If reject it, your backup MX will
> then bounce it to the ostensible sender, which is very likely forged.
For stuff I block via sendmail, I 550 it, even from my MX. I am not
sure what my MX does with it, but no one has complained.
For email that hits procmail, I ignore viruses and report spam to the
domain administrator of the mail sender host.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2004-04-22 01:45:43 | Re: 7.3.4 on Linux: UPDATE .. foo=foo+1 degrades massivly over time |
Previous Message | Jon Pastore | 2004-04-22 01:12:27 | postgresql idle |