From: | Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Unicode problem ??? |
Date: | 2004-04-21 19:57:25 |
Message-ID: | 20040421215725.Q817@hermes.hilbert.loc |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> What I personally don't understand is: if all my databases
> are UNICODE, why do I have to set the Client encoding to latin1
> to get a correct result?
Because LATIN1 isn't just a subset of UNICODE. If the data
coming out of the database *is* UNICODE *and* your client
*does* handle UNICODE directly you might get away with not
setting a client_encoding, same goes for DB=latin1 +
client=latin1. If, however, the DB delivers UNICODE but your
client really wants LATIN1 you need to tell the database to
convert the stored UNICODE to LATIN1 before delivery. That's
what the client_encoding is for.
Or so is my understanding of it.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-04-21 19:59:36 | Re: kill -2 |
Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2004-04-21 19:48:14 | Re: 7.3.4 on Linux: UPDATE .. foo=foo+1 degrades massivly over time |