From: | "Chris Hoover" <revoohc(at)sermonaudio(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Help understanding stat tables |
Date: | 2004-04-21 16:24:35 |
Message-ID: | 200404211224.35696.revoohc@sermonaudio.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
I think I have figured my problem out.
I was taking heap_blks_hit / heap_blks_read for my hit pct.
It should be heap_blks_hit/(heap_blks_read+heap_blks_hit), correct?
Thanks
On Wednesday 21 April 2004 11:34, Chris Hoover wrote:
> I just want to make sure that I am interpreting this data correctly.
>
> From pg_statio_user_tables, I have pulled relname, heap_blks_read,
> heap_blks_hit. I get several rows like this:
> relname heap_bkls_read heap_blks_hit
> clmhdr 8607161 196547165
>
>
> So this means that I am getting over a 100% cache hit ratio for this table,
> right? If not, please help me understand what these numbers mean.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frédéric Robinet | 2004-04-21 16:29:06 | Shared buffers, Sort memory, Effective Cache Size |
Previous Message | Edoardo Ceccarelli | 2004-04-21 16:23:12 | Re: slow seqscan |