Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?

From: L J Bayuk <ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com>
To: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian)
Cc: pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian), ljb220(at)mindspring(dot)com (L J Bayuk), pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL-interfaces), pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org (PostgreSQL-development), scrappy(at)hub(dot)org (Marc G(dot) Fournier)
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Date: 2004-04-20 01:40:36
Message-ID: 200404200141.i3K1fWTl000834@mindspring.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> ...
> OK, Marc has removed libpgtcl. I just removed the docs for them.
>
> Can someone comment on pgtclsh? The README says:
>...
>
> Do we need to move that over to gborg? If so, you can pull it out of
> 7.4 CVS.
>
> Anyone?

Already discussed:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00076.php
and
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2004-02/msg00078.php

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sailesh Krishnamurthy 2004-04-20 01:58:02 Position available at the Telegraph project
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-20 01:37:18 Re: [HACKERS] locale issues on win32 (fix?)

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-20 02:02:39 Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-04-20 01:14:07 Re: [HACKERS] Why is libpgtcl still in CVS?