| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)ehpg(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: New News Entry |
| Date: | 2004-04-14 17:26:47 |
| Message-ID: | 200404141926.47307.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Gavin M. Roy wrote:
> If it's a substantial contribution, which some would argue that
> Nested Transactions alone is, and it's not vapor-ware, whats the
> problem with that?
So far it is vaporware. And no one can verify what kind of agreement has
been made or who is developing this code or whether it will go into any
release. The people coding it aren't even mentioned. It's just the
same old "MySQL 4.1 will include views" nonsense that we should stay
away from.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-04-14 17:45:57 | Re: New News Entry |
| Previous Message | Gavin M. Roy | 2004-04-14 17:16:31 | Re: New News Entry |