From: | "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
Cc: | Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: 7.5 beta version |
Date: | 2004-04-14 09:24:06 |
Message-ID: | 20040414092406.GS36224@xs4all.nl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 12:22:18AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > But in the case of x86 (among others) that's the in-register
> > representation, no? IIRC they are stored to memory as 64-bit doubles at
> > best.
>
> You also have "long double"s on some compilers which could be 80 bit.
Actually, they're a supported feature in both C99 and C++ IIRC. But I
still suspect they're not *actually* 80 bits, at least not in memory.
> We gave up trying to make C++ dlls on windows because of ABI/name
> mangling problems, never tried it again though.
>
> The compilers from Microsoft and Borland atleast aren't
> compatible.
But that shows up as link errors, not at runtime, right?
Jeroen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2004-04-14 11:08:55 | Re: 7.5 beta version |
Previous Message | Dennis Bjorklund | 2004-04-14 08:36:22 | Re: Lexing with different charsets |