From: | Terry Brick <terry_brick2000(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Formatting Functions and Group By |
Date: | 2004-04-13 17:49:19 |
Message-ID: | 20040413174919.79405.qmail@web11508.mail.yahoo.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Thank you both for your responses. That's just what I needed.... and thanks for catching my
mistake Tom. And may I say that I am VERY happy to be moving to Postgres. The lack of a native
Win32 version was thing only thing holding us back from Postgres previously.
I think this is the only kind of query I will have had difficulty porting. I'm looking forward to
ditching MySQL and never looking back!! :)
--- Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Ah, good ol' MySQL :-( ... let the user do what he wants whether the
> result is well defined or not ...
>
> I'd suggest doing the grouping/ordering numerically rather than
> textually. For instance,
>
> select
> to_char(date_trunc('month', myCol), 'Mon YY')
> from
> myTable
> group by
> date_trunc('month', myCol)
> order by
> date_trunc('month', myCol);
>
> Now this assumes you really want a time-based ordering, which the quoted
> example doesn't give --- you've got month sorting to the left of year,
> is that really what you want? If it is then you'd need to go
>
> group by
> date_trunc('month', myCol)
> order by
> to_char(date_trunc('month', myCol), 'MM YYYY')
>
> regards, tom lane
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway
http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Boes | 2004-04-13 18:34:38 | Re: SQL challenge--top 10 for each key value? |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2004-04-13 17:36:01 | Re: trigger/for key help |