Re: [PERFORM] Raw devices vs. Filesystems

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Grega Bremec <gregab(at)noviforum(dot)si>
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Raw devices vs. Filesystems
Date: 2004-04-09 16:02:00
Message-ID: 200404090902.00934.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-performance

Grega,

> Well, as I said, that's why I was asking - I'm willing to give it a go
> if nobody can prove me wrong. :)

Why not? If you have time?

> I thought you knew - OCFS, OCFS-Tools and OCFSv2 have not only been open-
> source for quite a while now - they're released under the GPL.

Keen! Wonder if we can make them regret it.

Seriously, if Oracle opened this stuff, it's probably becuase they used some
GPL components in it. It also probably means that it won't work for
anything but Oracle ...

> I don't know what that means to you (probably nothing good, as PostgreSQL
> is released under the BSD license),

Well, it just means that we can't ship OCFS with PostgreSQL.

> The question does spring up though, that Steve raised in another post -
> just for the record, what POSIX semantics can a postmaster live without in
> a filesystem?

You might want to ask that question again on Hackers. I don't know the
answer, myself.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-04-09 16:33:02 Re: Multiple disks
Previous Message scott.marlowe 2004-04-09 15:10:17 Re: Multiple disks

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Matthews 2004-04-09 16:12:38 Re: Wierd issues
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-09 15:02:11 Re: Wierd issues