From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
Cc: | Michael Groth <geek_1981(at)yahoo(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation? |
Date: | 2004-04-08 22:59:51 |
Message-ID: | 200404082259.i38Mxph02515@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 06:01:03 -0700,
> Michael Groth <geek_1981(at)yahoo(dot)de> wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > is it possible to use an index on the expression '(table_1.field &
> > table_2.field)::int > 0' ?
> >
> > here's the whole query:
> >
> > SELECT
> > COUNT(*)
> > FROM
> > users AS users
> > JOIN
> > search_profile AS search_profile ON
> > (search_profile.bin_matching_field_0 &
> > users.bin_matching_field_0)::int > 0
> > WHERE
> > users.id = 190
>
> In 7.4 you can create indexes on expressions.
But it uses two different tables. You can't mix tables in an index, can
you?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Brown | 2004-04-09 01:52:59 | Re: Function to kill backend |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-04-08 21:45:14 | Re: using index on comparison with bit-operation? |