From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | David Garamond <lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: More aggregate functions? |
Date: | 2004-04-07 11:55:08 |
Message-ID: | 20040407115508.GW7060@ns.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
* David Garamond (lists(at)zara(dot)6(dot)isreserved(dot)com) wrote:
> What do people think of adding some more aggregate functions. These are
> the ones that MySQL has and PG doesn't:
>
> - STD/STDDEV
> - VARIANCE
> - BIT_OR
> - BIT_AND
> - GROUP_CONCAT (for strings, added in MySQL 4.x)
[...]
> Btw, I have written 1 or 2 of the above myself with CREATE AGGREGATE.
> But perhaps it would be nice if it's available as a builtin function or
> at least present in contrib/.
There's an example of GROUP_CONCAT already in the mailing lists but
a more obvious place, linked from the documentation, would be really
nice. Having the functions included in the main distribution would be
nice too, of course. :) I'd be happy to host such a page if necessary
but I really think it'd be better on postgresql.org and linked in from
the documentation as 'other non-standard/extra functions' or some such.
What can we do to make this happen?
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Huxton | 2004-04-07 12:25:14 | Re: Can the username calling a function be made available within the function? |
Previous Message | Jan Wieck | 2004-04-07 11:51:11 | Re: Cursors and Transactions, why? |