Re: Socket communication for contrib

Hans-Jrgen Schnig wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=FCrgen_Sch=F6nig?= <postgres(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
> >
> >>Nested transactions: I don't think nested transactions will really help
> >>to resolve the core problem. Committing a subtransaction will most
> >>likely not imply that a parent transaction can be committed as well.
> >
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> >
> >>As I said: Some people MIGHT find it useful in some special cases.
> >>If the community decides that it does not enough sense to integrate it
> >>into contrib I can live with that.
> >
> >
> > I won't take a position on whether it's useful enough to put in contrib,
> > but if people want it there, I'd just ask that the README be extended to
> > point out the transactional risks.
>
> this should not be a problem.
> I can intregrate all necessary information there.
>
> folks, let's do a poll ...
> who is for it - who is against it ...

Is it better in /contrib or gborg?

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073