| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions |
| Date: | 2004-04-03 23:26:25 |
| Message-ID: | 200404040126.25628.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-sql |
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Just got this "do we support it" questionnaire from a signficant
> commercial entity vaguely interested in supporting PostrgreSQL.
> Since I'm often foggy on the differences between the SQL99 and SQL92
> spec definitions of things, I thought I'd post it for feedback here:
The list of supported features can be found here:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/features.html
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devrim GUNDUZ | 2004-04-05 06:17:36 | Some news from Turkey |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-04-03 23:24:42 | Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Postgres User | 2004-04-05 15:45:18 | oracle varray functionality? |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-04-03 23:24:42 | Re: SQL Spec Compliance Questions |