From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Andrew Rawnsley <ronz(at)ravensfield(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug? |
Date: | 2004-03-30 20:06:08 |
Message-ID: | 200403301506.08882.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tuesday 30 March 2004 11:38, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > If you search the pgsql-sql archives you'll find some helpful threads on
> > using nested sets in PostgreSQL, one in particular I was involved with
> > was a generic "move_tree" function that enabled moving a node from one
> > branch to another.
>
> I have to admit to failing to follow -SQL over the last few months. This
> list and Hackers are pretty much the only ones I read all of.
>
> Maybe I should get back on -SQL and we can compare move_tree functions :-)
>
> Did yours use a temp table, or some other means?
Nope, Greg Mullane and I worked out the math and came up with an algorithm of
sorts that we could apply to the tree when moving elements.
<digs a little>
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-sql/2002-11/msg00355.php
Seemed to work though someone else had posted yet another version after
ours... and in fact the one posted is not exactly what I use now either :-)
Robert Treat
--
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-30 20:13:12 | Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug? |
Previous Message | Paul Thomas | 2004-03-30 19:39:21 | Re: select slow? |