Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, "Jaime Casanova" <el_vigia_ec(at)hotmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
Date: 2004-03-30 16:43:01
Message-ID: 200403300843.01437.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Jaime, Richard,

> That's going to depend on a number of things:
> There are some test results people have provided in the archives, but
> whether they apply to your setup is open to argument.

True. On Linux overall, XFS, JFS, and Reiser have all looked good at one time
or another. Ext3 has never been a leader for performance, though, so that's
an easy elimination.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Huxton 2004-03-30 17:28:59 Re: [ADMIN] Raw vs Filesystem
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-30 16:38:50 Re: Nested Sets WAS: column size too large, is this a bug?