From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
Date: | 2004-03-24 16:17:33 |
Message-ID: | 20040324161733.GA16498@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 09:55:34AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> This thread seems to have died without a conclusion. AFAICS, we have 5
> options:
>
> . the apache program - see below
> pro: robust, portable, extremely well tested, no effort to import
> con: possible license issues, limited features
One of the folks who works with me at Afilias, Andrew Hammond, is
trying to clean up a patch he made to include the apache log rotator
"natively". We've been looking at it because I'm worried about the
I/O our current approach imposes, and we need to have something to
compare it with. I think he told me that he'll have a patch ready to
offer in a day or two. Of course, it would depend on actually having
the rotator program sitting around somewhere.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | scott.marlowe | 2004-03-24 16:32:52 | Re: Log rotation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-24 15:52:58 | Re: pg_advisor schema proof of concept |