From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh(at)cs(dot)berkeley(dot)edu> |
Cc: | Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | subversion vs cvs (Was: Re: linked list rewrite) |
Date: | 2004-03-24 03:03:03 |
Message-ID: | 20040323225825.W3456@ganymede.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Sailesh Krishnamurthy wrote:
> Which brings me to another question .. has anybody considered using
> subversion instead of CVS ?
Why? not that I'm for a chance from something that isn't broken, but what
advantages does subversion give us over what we already have?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-24 03:31:30 | Re: linked list rewrite |
Previous Message | Wes Palmer | 2004-03-24 02:39:42 | Re: Solaris ecpg program doesn't work - pulling my hair |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Buttafuoco | 2004-03-24 03:03:34 | PANIC: hash table "Shared Buffer Lookup Table" corrupted |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-03-24 02:57:14 | Re: pg_dump locks a table on dumping ... ? |