From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |
Date: | 2004-03-23 22:03:38 |
Message-ID: | 20040323220338.GA14682@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 08:53:42PM -0000, matt(at)ymogen(dot)net wrote:
> is way down the priority list compared with IO throughput, stability,
> manageability, support, etc etc.
Indeed, if our Suns actually diabled the broken hardware when they
died, fell over, and rebooted themselves, I'd certainly praise them
to heaven. But I have to say that the really very good reporting of
failing memory has saved me some headaches.
> environment, I'd take the Sun every day of the week, assuming that those
> compile option changes have sorted out the oddly slow PG performance at
> last.
I seem to have hit a bad batch of Dell hardware recently, which makes
me second this opinion.
I should say, also, that my initial experience of AIX has been
extremely good. I can't comment on the fun it might involve in the
long haul, of course.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
This work was visionary and imaginative, and goes to show that visionary
and imaginative work need not end up well.
--Dennis Ritchie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bill Moran | 2004-03-23 22:10:19 | Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |
Previous Message | Craig Thomas | 2004-03-23 21:56:35 | Re: [ADMIN] Benchmarking postgres on Solaris/Linux |