| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking |
| Date: | 2004-03-18 19:22:10 |
| Message-ID: | 200403181922.i2IJMAd16258@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 01:50:32PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > I'm not sure I believe these numbers at all... my experience is that
> > > getting trustworthy disk I/O numbers is *not* easy.
> >
> > These numbers were reproducable on all the platforms I tested.
>
> It's not because they are reproducable that they mean anything in
> the real world.
OK, what better test do you suggest? Right now, there has been no
testing of these.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-18 19:28:07 | Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking |
| Previous Message | Kurt Roeckx | 2004-03-18 19:18:40 | Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-18 19:28:07 | Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking |
| Previous Message | Kurt Roeckx | 2004-03-18 19:18:40 | Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking |