Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1'

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
Cc: "Alex J(dot) Avriette" <alex(at)posixnap(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Timing of 'SELECT 1'
Date: 2004-03-14 03:44:26
Message-ID: 200403140344.i2E3iQa27768@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > > The problem with gprof is that I am going to see all the backend
> startup
> > > stuff too, no? Is there a way to get a dump just the run of the
> query?
> >
> > I was sort of lurking on this thread, waiting to see what became of
> it.
> > Did
> > nobody actually come to a conclusion on what that "last msec" was
> from?
>
> I think the consensus was it was coming from the network layer somehow.
> If that's the case (it probably is), there isn't a whole lot that can be
> done about it except to bypass it using server side functions and such.
>

I did a little more research and found an unusual cause. It turns out
enabling log_parser/executor_status itself makes SELECT 1's log_duration
go from 0.296 to 1.156 so the slowness I was seeing for SELECT 1 was
from the measurement, not slowness in the normal code path.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-14 04:06:42 Re: libpq thread safety
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-03-14 00:26:18 Re: 7.4.2 Build broken on (Sparc) Solaris 7 and 8