| From: | Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
| Date: | 2004-03-12 20:29:40 |
| Message-ID: | 20040312202940.GA9345@wolff.to |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 15:19:29 -0500,
Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> >I can see their problem with making a dependency to all of apache or
> >including
> >multilog in their distribution. But they probably could include something
> >that is only a logger either using some project that is only a logger or
> >splitting out the logger that is bundled with apache. Then it wouldn't
> >be unreasonable to make a dependency for postgres requiring that logging
> >rpm. Other services could also make use of this logging package as well.
> >
>
> Yes that would be nice. I have no idea how difficult it would be to
> extricate the logrotate program from Apache. I also don't know if there
> would be any license restrictions, would we be able to redistribute it as
> an independently package? I don't know the answer.
I was suggesting this as something a distro maintainer (such as Redhat)
could do. I think that the postgres developers shouldn't be spending
time doing this. They should be just suggesting some possibilities
in the admin part of the documentation.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-12 23:20:49 | Stability of planner estimates given multiple redundant clauses |
| Previous Message | Fernando Nasser | 2004-03-12 20:21:57 | Re: Log rotation |