| From: | Lamar Owen <lowen(at)pari(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Log rotation |
| Date: | 2004-03-12 19:30:46 |
| Message-ID: | 200403121430.47844.lowen@pari.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 12 March 2004 09:24 am, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> I don't really care on how its done, but IMO an enterprise class
> database must be able to do log rotation. Logging to Syslog is not an
> option (specially with our verbosity) -- users must be able to use flat
> files for logging.
Uh, we have many many many different ways to use syslog. So my other message
on the topic.
> I never seem some many customer complaints and bug reports about a
> single item like the ones we have received here about logging. I think
> this should be the number 1 item in te TODO list.
Uh, upgrading? I'm sure we have more reports about upgrading than logging.
But see my reply to bug 103767 for more.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC 28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2004-03-12 19:52:04 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-03-12 19:22:05 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. |