From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Andreas Pflug <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
Date: | 2004-03-12 16:56:53 |
Message-ID: | 200403120856.53073.josh@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Robert,
> maybe pgsqlfoundry is a better compromise?
No, too long. People'd end up calling it pgFoundry anyway.
Besides, Gavin Roy already designed us a nice "pgFoundry" logo. ;-)
--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-03-12 17:20:00 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-03-12 16:54:53 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-03-12 17:20:00 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. pgfoundry.org |
Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-03-12 16:54:53 | Re: [HACKERS] The Name Game: postgresql.net vs. |