Re: selective statement logging

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >Sure you sure? I didn't think you would get a tag on a syntax error, so
> >no log would print, which I think is OK.
> >
> >
> >
> If people are happy with suppressing statement logging on a parse error,
> OK. For the remainder I would just defer the logging till immediately
> after the parse and get the tags for the statements - and suppress
> logging the query string if they were all SELECT or all
> SELECT|INSERT|UPDATE|DELETE|COPY according to the setting.

Good. My feeling is that if there is a parse error, we can't be sure
what type of query was sent, and it isn't going to be executed anyway
because it threw an error.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073