From: | Paolo Tavalazzi <ptavalazzi(at)charta(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | postgres FROM clause problem |
Date: | 2004-03-10 10:59:37 |
Message-ID: | 200403101159.37741.ptavalazzi@charta.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I need help!
I suppose that for query like :
SELECT * FROM a, b, c WHERE a.id = b.id AND b.ref = c.id;
the planner is free to join the given tables in any order to find the most efficent query plan.
I have two query that they are different only for order of the tables in FROM lclause , but give back different query plan :
1) ###################
explain analyze SELECT
teatri.code,
spettacoli.code,
sum(seat.price)
sum(seat.prev)
FROM
seat,
spettacoli,
tran ,
teatri
WHERE
tran.time >= timestamp '2004-03-01 00:00:00' AND
tran.time <= timestamp '2004-03-08 23:59:59' AND
tran.perf_code = spettacoli.code AND
tran.thea_code = spettacoli.teatro AND
tran.id = seat.bt_id AND
tran.system = seat.system AND
spettacoli.system = tran.system AND
spettacoli.teatro = teatri.code
GROUP BY
1,2
with EXPLAIN :
HashAggregate (cost=8540.03..8540.20 rows=5 width=30) (actual time=3210.659..3212.403 rows=1317 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=7853.66..8539.98 rows=5 width=30) (actual time=1316.663..2822.181 rows=67218 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=7853.66..8516.75 rows=5 width=43) (actual time=1316.625..1901.870 rows=68167 loops=1)
-> Merge Join (cost=7853.66..8462.71 rows=9 width=47) (actual time=1316.555..1519.227 rows=24919 loops=1)
Merge Cond: (("outer"."?column4?" = "inner"."?column6?") AND ("outer".system = "inner".system) AND ("outer".teatro = "inner".thea_code))
-> Sort (cost=6158.07..6298.27 rows=56079 width=26) (actual time=650.575..658.869 rows=48297 loops=1)
Sort Key: (spettacoli.code)::text, spettacoli.system, spettacoli.teatro
-> Seq Scan on spettacoli (cost=0.00..1734.79 rows=56079 width=26) (actual time=0.020..94.725 rows=56079 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=1695.59..1727.03 rows=12576 width=32) (actual time=619.904..625.457 rows=24923 loops=1)
Sort Key: (tran.perf_code)::text, tran.system, tran.thea_code
-> Index Scan using time_idx on tran (cost=0.00..839.27 rows=12576 width=32) (actual time=0.121..104.945 rows=24923 loops=1)
Index Cond: (("time" >= ('2004-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone)::timestamp with time zone) AND ("time" <= ('2004-03-08 23:59:59'::timestamp without time zone)::timestamp with time zone))
Filter: ((kind <> 9) AND (kind <> 10) AND (kind <> 3) AND (kind <> 7) AND (status = 0))
-> Index Scan using id_system_idx on seat (cost=0.00..5.99 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=0.007..0.010 rows=3 loops=24919)
Index Cond: (("outer".id = seat.bt_id) AND ("outer".system = seat.system))
-> Index Scan using teatri_pkey on teatri (cost=0.00..4.63 rows=1 width=13) (actual time=0.010..0.011 rows=1 loops=68167)
Index Cond: (teatri.code = "outer".thea_code)
Total runtime: 3224.260 ms
2)
explain analyze SELECT
teatri.code,
spettacoli.code,
sum(seat.price),
sum(seat.prev)
FROM
seat,
teatri,
tran ,
spettacoli
WHERE
tran.time >= timestamp '2004-03-01 00:00:00' AND
tran.time <= timestamp '2004-03-08 23:59:59' AND
tran.perf_code = spettacoli.code AND
tran.thea_code = spettacoli.teatro AND
tran.id = seat.bt_id AND
tran.system = seat.system AND
spettacoli.system = tran.system AND
spettacoli.teatro = teatri.code
GROUP BY
1,2
with EXPLAIN :
HashAggregate (cost=8355.46..8355.49 rows=1 width=30) (actual time=48126.117..48127.715 rows=1317 loops=1)
-> Nested Loop (cost=1909.00..8355.45 rows=1 width=30) (actual time=504.927..47738.287 rows=67218 loops=1)
-> Merge Join (cost=1909.00..8301.41 rows=9 width=34) (actual time=504.873..47385.221 rows=24788 loops=1)
Merge Cond: (("outer".system = "inner".system) AND ("outer".teatro = "inner".code))
Join Filter: (("inner".perf_code)::text = ("outer".code)::text)
-> Index Scan using spe_sys_tea_perf on spettacoli (cost=0.00..5856.59 rows=56079 width=26) (actual time=0.019..67.663 rows=55352 loops=1)
-> Sort (cost=1909.00..1940.44 rows=12576 width=45) (actual time=501.736..2592.348 rows=12816353 loops=1)
Sort Key: tran.system, teatri.code
-> Hash Join (cost=24.78..1052.68 rows=12576 width=45) (actual time=1.581..190.530 rows=24792 loops=1)
Hash Cond: ("outer".thea_code = "inner".code)
-> Index Scan using time_idx on tran (cost=0.00..839.27 rows=12576 width=32) (actual time=0.074..67.643 rows=24923 loops=1)
Index Cond: (("time" >= ('2004-03-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time zone)::timestamp with time zone) AND ("time" <= ('2004-03-08 23:59:59'::timestamp without time zone)::timestamp with time zone))
Filter: ((kind <> 9) AND (kind <> 10) AND (kind <> 3) AND (kind <> 7) AND (status = 0))
-> Hash (cost=22.62..22.62 rows=862 width=13) (actual time=1.348..1.348 rows=0 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on teatri (cost=0.00..22.62 rows=862 width=13) (actual time=0.011..0.792 rows=862 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using id_system_idx on seat (cost=0.00..5.99 rows=1 width=10) (actual time=0.006..0.009 rows=3 loops=24788)
Index Cond: (("outer".id = seat.bt_id) AND ("outer".system = seat.system))
Total runtime: 48131.798 ms
Why this difference?
i must not have the same plan in both the cases?
I use postgres 7.4
thank you!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mattias Kregert | 2004-03-10 11:18:37 | Re: Error message |
Previous Message | Fred Moyer | 2004-03-10 10:44:09 | Re: updates (postgreSQL) very slow |