From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | shridhar(at)frodo(dot)hserus(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT] Respository [was Re: [PERFORM] Feature request: smarter |
Date: | 2004-03-09 17:46:01 |
Message-ID: | 200403091746.i29Hk1B23539@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
Shridhar Daithankar wrote:
> On Sunday 07 March 2004 09:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Personally I consider -c format the only one of the three that is
> > readable for reviewing purposes, so even if I weren't intending
> > immediate application, I'd ask for -c before looking at the patch.
> > There are some folks who consider -u format readable, but I'm not
> > one of them ...
>
> I was wondering what people use to keep track of their personal development
> especially when they do not have a cvs commit access.
See the developer's FAQ. They usually use cporig to make copies of
files they are going to modify, then difforig to send the diffs to us,
or they copy the entire source tree, modify it, and do a recursive diff
themselves.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2004-03-09 17:46:33 | Re: PITR Functional Design v2 for 7.5 |
Previous Message | Lee Kindness | 2004-03-09 17:30:41 | ECPG - Specifying connections, TSD, sqlca. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2004-03-09 18:48:33 | Re: [OT] Respository [was Re: [PERFORM] Feature request: |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-09 15:37:30 | Re: speeding up a select with C function? |