Re: Database Encryption (now required by law in Italy)

From: Silvana Di Martino <silvanadimartino(at)tin(dot)it>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Galbavy <peter(dot)galbavy(at)knowtion(dot)net>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Database Encryption (now required by law in Italy)
Date: 2004-03-08 22:43:37
Message-ID: 200403082219.06167.silvanadimartino@tin.it
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

Alle 17:29, lunedì 8 marzo 2004, Joe Conway ha scritto:
> Silvana Di Martino wrote:
> > Oracle has a built-in feature for encrypting/decrypting this password's
> > password.
>
> Right, and this master password is only protected because Oracle is
> closed source. It is not possible to do the same thing with Postgres
> because you could find the master key (or the algorithm to produce it)
> in the source code.
>
> However this amounts to "security by obscurity", and anyone serious
> about encryption will tell you it is insufficient. There is no way to
> have cryptographically sound protection of your data using a key
> embedded in the software like that.

Right. I completely agree. The only way to implement such a mechanism in a
open source product is to keep the password away from the RDBMS host. See my
previous messages for a plausible scenario.

See you

-----------------------------------------
Alessandro Bottoni and Silvana Di Martino
alessandrobottoni(at)interfree(dot)it
silvanadimartino(at)tin(dot)it

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2004-03-08 23:51:56 Re: HIPAA
Previous Message Silvana Di Martino 2004-03-08 22:43:12 Re: Article on DB encryption