| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Win32 regression test status |
| Date: | 2004-03-08 18:35:05 |
| Message-ID: | 200403081835.i28IZ5q11376@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Claudio Natoli wrote:
>
> [resurrecting this thread from the dead]
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > It's not mandated but we need to know why this platform acts
> > differently from the rest. The join failures look like it may be an issue
>
> > of the qsort() implementation acting differently for equal keys than most
> do.
> > Not sure whether the same applies to rules.
>
> Any "off the top of the head" ideas on how to confirm/test this? Or how to
> proceed otherwise?
Uh, I think you just add ORDER BY to the query and see if the output now
matches the regression test. If so, submit a patch to add the ORDER BY.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-03-08 18:38:52 | Re: Win32 regression test status |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-08 17:30:41 | Re: Tablespaces |