From: | Gorshkov <listsubscriptions(at)oghma(dot)on(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: HIPAA |
Date: | 2004-03-08 22:25:34 |
Message-ID: | 200403081725.34306.listsubscriptions@oghma.on.ca |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On March 8, 2004 09:07, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 12:07:23PM +0000, Silvana Di Martino wrote:
> > This seems to give to this "db encryption" issue the status of "global
> > relevance" that would deserve a more systematic approach. I mean: no
> > homegrown solutions - rather have the community to develop a specific,
> > standard extension of PostgreSQL and put it into the distro.
>
> Just to throw another wrench into the works, you might want to think
> about some of the observations on what data you _really_ need that
> are in Peter Wayner's _Translucent Databases_ (Flyzone Press, 2002.
> ISBN 0-9675844-1-8). Many of the techniques are not particularly
> novel, but the discussion in the beginning about deciding just which
> data you _really_ need is, I think, very helpful. There's a tendency
> to collect data just because one can, and the new data protection
> laws are an attempt to find a techno fix to the problem. (I still
> like it that someone is spending some time on improving the crypto
> stuff, though.)
>
> A
Many, many moons ago when I was young and stupid, I was in an intelligence
trade in the Cdn Navy - COMINT/SIGINT.
it never ceases to amaze me at how consistantly people underestimate the
information that can be taken from a datum - especially when aggrigated with
data from other sources.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Silvana Di Martino | 2004-03-08 22:43:12 | Re: Article on DB encryption |
Previous Message | Juan Miguel | 2004-03-08 22:12:22 | Re: Postgres and multiprocessor? |