Re: Fixed width rows faster?

From: Mike Nolan <nolan(at)gw(dot)tssi(dot)com>
To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
Cc: wmoran(at)potentialtech(dot)com (Bill Moran), threshar(at)torgo(dot)978(dot)org (Jeff), pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fixed width rows faster?
Date: 2004-03-05 23:43:33
Message-ID: 200403052343.i25NhYsv021796@gw.tssi.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

> Frankly, the only reason to use anything other than TEXT is compatibility with
> other databases and applications.

You don't consider a requirement that a field be no longer than a
certain length a reason not to use TEXT?
--
Mike Nolan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2004-03-05 23:54:04 Re: Fixed width rows faster?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-03-05 23:37:02 Re: Fixed width rows faster?