Re: notice about costly ri checks (2)

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'd suggest something along the lines of
> >>
> >> NOTICE: foreign key constraint "constrname" will require a cross-type conversion
> >> DETAIL: key columns "fkcol" and "pkcol" are of different types integer and double precision
>
> > I suggested the constraint name because of multi-column keys, where he
> > would have to print an arbitrary number of columns in the message. It
> > didn't seem worth doing that work. I see your idea of just printing the
> > column, but that doesn't really point to the primary/foreign key
> > relationship. If the user can't figure out which columns are a mismatch
> > from the constraint name, they have larger problems than this. :-)
>
> Why should we make them guess which column is the problem, when we know
> it perfectly well?

OK.

> >> If you want it to be a WARNING then we gotta work on the text some more.
>
> > Yes, let's re-add 'costly' to the text:
>
> > WARNING: foreign key constraint "constrname" will require a costly cross-type conversion
>
> Works for me, but I still want the DETAIL ...

Sounds good.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073