From: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | lowen(at)pari(dot)edu |
Cc: | tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right |
Date: | 2004-03-05 04:19:30 |
Message-ID: | 20040305.131930.115906528.t-ishii@sra.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> On Thursday 04 March 2004 10:28 pm, Tom Lane wrote:
> > There were no code-change differences in this rewrap, so I see no real
> > need to change the version number.
>
> > The lesson I'd prefer to see us take away from this is that Marc needs
> > to automate his release wrapping process more. These sorta mistakes
> > shouldn't have happened in the first place ...
>
> There are now multiple copies of 7.3.6 out there. How is a body to know which
> one to use? On RPMs, as you well now, SOP is to increment the release on any
> change, including a typo. This way there is no ambiguity.
>
> This is not the first time tarballs have been streamlined. I'm glad I hadn't
> built any RPMs yet.
Sigh. I'm very uncomfortable with the existence of two versions of
7.3.6. Also the fact that I cannot get the "right" tar ball till it is
copied to mirrors makes me uncomfortable too.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Swan | 2004-03-05 07:51:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Tablespaces |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-03-05 04:08:47 | Re: Sigh, 7.3.6 rewrap not right |