Re: META: Filtering viruses/worms

From: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: META: Filtering viruses/worms
Date: 2004-03-04 14:04:07
Message-ID: 20040304100225.O66678@ganymede.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> /usr/local/libexec/ppf_verify: pgp command failed
>
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
> gpg: Signature made Thu Mar 4 07:42:30 2004 AST using DSA key ID 14964AC8
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> > X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postgresql.org
>
> Since "amavisd" does not appear to be catching the latest worm,
> how about filtering on size? Anything, say, over 20K will be held
> for approval. Here are the top posts by size to this list recently:

The problem is, where do we stop? Tom pop'd me off a note about it
yesterday, and we drop'd it from 40k to 30k ... :(

----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Eva Hovelsrød 2004-03-04 14:17:35 Inherited tables and foreign keys
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2004-03-04 13:19:28 Re: clarification of postgres limitations