From: | Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Scaling further up |
Date: | 2004-03-03 11:32:22 |
Message-ID: | 20040303113222.GA12150@phlogiston.dyndns.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 04:50:04PM -0500, Anjan Dave wrote:
> time/resources to do extensive testing, I am not sure if
> Postgres/Solaris9 is really suggested by the community for
> high-performance, as opposed to a XEON/Linux setup. Storage being a
> separate discussion.
I can tell you from experience that performance on Solaris is nowhere
close to what you'd expect, given the coin you're forking over for
it. I think the reason to use Solaris is its support for all the
nifty hot-swappable hardware, and not for its speed or any putative
benefit you might get from having 64 bits at your disposal.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Florian Weimer | 2004-03-03 14:10:32 | Re: Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1 |
Previous Message | Florian Weimer | 2004-03-03 09:25:28 | Bulk INSERT performance in 7.4.1 |